Ok, I know that it's in the daily fail, but this story seems slightly bonkers to me. Surely if his "deeply held" beliefs "that people should live their lives with mindful respect for animals and we all have a moral obligation to live in a way which is kind to each other, our environment and our fellow creatures" are that important, then so are any other strongly held beliefs.
So what about cases like this, this and this. As far as I know, it's still illegal to be a BNP member and a police officer - what about the "deeply held" beliefs of BNP members?
(And I do feel that I should mention here, I am not in the BNP, nor do I approve of their stance, but people can believe whatever the hell they want to believe. Free speech is more than just a soundbite - it's something that's sadly absent in the UK. And think about it: a police officer who was a BNP member would have to be extra careful not to engage in anything that might look even slightly racist while on duty, else the defense in court would have a field day with him - so if anything, he'd be less racist than the average police officer. I think the best way to deal with groups like the BNP is to let them have their say, then debate it with them...)
CIA whistleblower’s insights into the Deep State
6 hours ago